Modal Logic vs. Ontological Argument

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Modal Ontological Argument

We know more today about the second, or so-called 'modal', version of St. Anselm's ontological argument than we did when Charles Hartshorne and Norman Malcolm brought it to the attention of philosophers some years ago. But there is still much to be learned. Criticisms of the modal ontological argument focus on its premises, namely (i) the claim that perfection, or maximal greatness, implies nec...

متن کامل

On the Logic of the Ontological Argument∗

Saint Anselm of Canterbury offered several arguments for the existence of God. We examine the famous ontological argument in Proslogium ii. Many recent authors have interpreted this argument as a modal one.1 But we believe that Jonathan Barnes has argued persuasively that Anselm’s argument is not modal.2 Even if one were to construe the word ‘can’ in the definite description ‘that than which no...

متن کامل

Formalization and Assessment of Lowe’s Modal Ontological Argument

Concrete Necessary Numbers God Contingent Fiction Stuff Our experiments in Isabelle/HOL confirm that the conclusion C: ∃x.Necessary x ∧ Concrete x follows from premises P2: ∃x.Necessary x ∧ Abstract x, P3: ∀x.Abstract x → Dependent x, P4: ∀x.Dependent x → (∃y.Independent y ∧ x dependsOn y) and P5: ∀x.Necessary x → (∀y.x dependsOn y → Necessary y). Here, Necessary and Concrete are uninterpreted ...

متن کامل

Global vs. Local in Basic Modal Logic

We discuss results on global definability in basic modal logic, and contrast our model-theoretic results and proof techniques with known results about local definability.

متن کامل

The Ontological Presuppositions of the Ontological Argument*

JLhe most recent stage in the analysis of St. Anselm's Ontologi cal Argument is the modal-logical stage : if one wants to get clear as to what is wrong (or right) with it, one should phrase it in S5.1 I have misgivings about this maneuver, if it is claimed in the name of historical exegesis. While I think that the connnections between the Ontological Argument and modal logic are insightful and ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion

سال: 2012

ISSN: 1689-8311

DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v4i2.303